Analysis Debt book cover — Why AI Still Needs Business Analysis, by Erivan de Sena Ramos

A new book by Erivan de Sena Ramos

Analysis Debt

Why AI Still Needs Business Analysis

AI can make weak analysis look complete before anyone notices the thinking is missing. Requirements can be drafted, workshops summarised and decision papers prepared in minutes — polished is not the same as proven. This book gives that risk a name, a measure and a method.

"AI can accelerate the work. But it cannot own the judgement."

The Idea

Naming the debt AI-assisted work leaves behind

Analysis Debt names the hidden cost of moving forward with incomplete, weak or insufficiently validated analysis. It appears when assumptions become requirements, summaries become decisions, and artefacts look ready before the problem is fully understood.

Written for Business Analysts, Product Owners, AI transformation leaders and digital change professionals, this book explores why AI-assisted work still needs context, evidence, stakeholder validation and judgement. It offers practical ways to ask better questions, expose hidden assumptions, review AI outputs critically and stop weak analysis before it becomes expensive.

Chapter 9

Analysis Debt Index (ADI)

Turns a vague professional worry into something teams can name, measure and manage — plus a structured conversation for balancing speed against understanding.

Framework

BASELINE

The eight-element model for framing AI conversations before they produce anything — outcome, audience, source, output, limits, iteration, evidence, evaluation.

Framework

TRACE

The five-part review that decides whether an AI output deserves trust: Truth, Relevance, Assumptions, Consequences, Evidence.

Practice

The AI-Assisted BA Loop

The rhythm that ties it all together: Frame, Generate or Challenge, Review, Validate, Decide.

Interactive Tool

Calculate your team's Analysis Debt Index

The ADI is not a scientific measurement, maturity model or audit score — it's a conversation tool from Chapter 9 that helps teams ask one question: are we producing artefacts faster than we are producing understanding? Move the sliders to reflect an honest team discussion, not a guess.

ADI  =  (APS × AT) ÷ (PU + V + CT)
Artefact Production Speed (APS)9

How quickly are we producing BA artefacts compared with traditional effort?

AI Trust (AT)8

How much confidence is the team placing in AI-assisted outputs before human validation?

Problem Understanding (PU)4

How clearly do we understand the business problem, its causes, affected stakeholders and desired outcomes?

Validation (V)3

How much of the current analysis has been validated with the right people, evidence and source material?

Critical Thinking (CT)4

How actively are we challenging assumptions, testing evidence, exploring alternatives and reviewing AI-assisted outputs before using them?

Your ADI Score

6.5
Very high risk
0 Low2 Mod.4 High6 V.High8+

Do not rely on AI-assisted artefacts as decision-ready until problem understanding, validation and critical thinking improve.

Ask the team

  • Why is problem understanding scored this low?
  • Which stakeholders have not yet contributed?
  • Why is validation scored this low?

Conceptual tool from Analysis Debt, Chapter 9. Not a scientific measurement, audit score or performance metric — its value is in the conversation it starts, not the number it produces.

The Frameworks

BASELINE, TRACE, and the AI-Assisted BA Loop

Three practical models from the book for framing AI conversations, reviewing what comes back, and keeping the rhythm of judgement intact.

BASELINE — framing the conversation before AI produces anything

ElementMeaningPrompt question

TRACE — deciding whether an AI output deserves trust

ElementReview questionWhy it matters

The AI-Assisted Business Analysis Loop

The rhythm that ties BASELINE, TRACE and the ADI together across a piece of work.

More from the author

Writing on Medium

Erivan writes regularly on AI, business analysis and the future of the profession at erivanramos.medium.com. A few recent posts:

About the Author

Erivan de Sena Ramos

Erivan de Sena Ramos

Erivan de Sena Ramos is a Business Analysis Lead, Requirements Engineer, author and AI transformation practitioner with nearly two decades of experience helping organisations turn strategy into outcomes across Brazil and Australia. He is a Certified Business Analysis Professional (CBAP®), Project Management Professional (PMP®) and Certified ScrumMaster (CSM®), and holds ITIL® and COBIT® certifications.

An active contributor to the profession, he has repeatedly participated in BA mentor programs and served as a judge for the IIBA Annual Business Analysis Awards. He shares his work through magazine articles, conference presentations, published research and professional essays on Requirements Engineering, Business Analysis, AI, stakeholder engagement and digital transformation.

He is the author of Analysis Debt: Why AI Still Needs Business Analysis and The BA Renaissance: Elevate Your Impact as a Business Analyst. He has also written two books in Brazilian Portuguese: Dealing with Stakeholders: Best Practices for Business Analysis and Requirements Engineering, and Software Patterns for Systems Reengineering.

He writes regularly on Requirements Engineering, Business Analysis and AI at erivanramos.medium.com, where you can find more of his articles, essays and practical guidance for the profession.

CBAP® PMP® CSM® ITIL® COBIT®

Also by the author

Analysis Debt front cover Analysis Debt back cover

Available in eBook and Print

Get your copy of Analysis Debt

Why AI Still Needs Business Analysis — for Business Analysts, Product Owners, AI transformation leaders and digital change professionals who want to keep judgement in the loop.

Erivan de Sena Ramos speaking on AI and Business Analysis at FoBA 2025

Get in touch

Speaking, media, bulk orders & questions

For interviews, conference talks, corporate workshops on Analysis Debt / BASELINE / TRACE, or bulk book orders, reach out directly.

bookanalysisdebt@gmail.com